Monday, July 2, 2012

A sense of Bend.

There's a column in the Bulletin today that talks about the weakness of the Bend bus system, but avoids, I think, calling it what it seems to be: a failure. (At least, less than a success.)

I'm not judging the merits of mass transit, only whether it was ever going to be workable in Bend.

O.K. Those who want proof, can stop reading now.

This is more a sense of Bend that I have, a sense that we really are different.

When I visited all these other towns on our trip, I started to get a little uneasy. There were more comic shops, more card shops, more game stores, per capita, than in Bend. Bookstores were less predictable, with towns bigger than Bend having none, and towns smaller having more. But really, when you look at Bend from an objective standpoint, there should be more independent hobby shops than there are.

But Bend really only has one independent bookstore, one game store, one comic store. None of them have had it easy.

It's something ab0ut the demographics, is my sense, but I don't know.

My sense was that the bus system in Bend simply wouldn't be used enough. That the layout of Bend, or the attitude toward driving, or -- well, I couldn't prove it. But I was pretty sure this is one of those things that Bend -- because of it's size and relative importance to the region -- should have, because everyone else has them, but which would prove to be elusive.

We've had this idea in Bend for awhile now, that we should have everything a "city" should have. But some of these things -- that our size should allow -- simply don't work.

We are a tourist town, isolated for much of the year, rolling in visitors other times of year. That seems to be different model of economy that most towns our size.

At least that's my sense of it.

5 comments:

Duncan McGeary said...

One idea is that we don't have centralized major employers -- that is, a four year college with lots of students and employees, or major industrial, with hundreds of employees...

The other idea, is more or less the opposite idea. Most of the towns we visited were much more spread out, and you could find just about any kind of store in any part of town.

Whereas in Bend, if you're looking for certain types of businesses -- a jewelry store, for instance, there are only a few likely locations.

It's something -- about the demographics or the layout of the town...

H. Bruce Miller said...

I don't think it's the demographics and I don't think it's the layout in the way you describe. The layout of the town is too sprawling to allow for efficient public transportation. There are four major pockets of retail (downtown, the Old Mill District, the Costco District and the Forum, all miles away from each other) plus little retailers scattered and down 3rd Street. As you note, there are no big employers and no major college. And the residential neighborhoods are scattered hither and yon. This situation is by no means unique to Bend, or even unusual in America. The "New Urbanism" movement aimed (among other things) to promote communities that were more efficient, but it never really took off. The usual explanation is that Americans are too in love with their cars, but I think the real explanation is that Americans aren't willing to spend the necessary money redesigning and upgrading the infrastructure.

Leitmotiv said...

and by The Forum, Miller means Cascade Village.

Martha said...

Even though Bend's bus system SUCKS, I'm glad we have one. Bend is a tourist town, but unlike many other tourist towns, you can't walk from one end of town to the other in 15 minutes. Bend needs public transit, especially with the amount of poverty-level people here. It would just be nice if they could get their shit together.

H. Bruce Miller said...

"and by The Forum, Miller means Cascade Village."

You're right. I always forget that the Costco District is really the Forum.