My billings are scheduled in such a way that I know how much I've spent by the 10th of every month. So I know how much I have to earn the rest of the month.
The thing about my new tactic of trying for a 'working profit' -- paying all bills, personal and business, and all inventory, but not trying for 'extra' profit -- is that it is much easier to reach. At the same time, though, it's much more important that I not miss my goal.
Making 'extra' profit -- savings and retirement -- at least insulated me from down months, in that the extra often became what kept me from losing money.
Still, the reasoning behind removing this buffer is that I am able to stock the store better, with the result -- hopefully -- of more often having the item in stock, and -- hopefully -- making more sales.
I'm gambling, in a sense, that by spending that last 10%, that I can increase sales by at least 10% -- or maybe even more.
The downside of spending to the absolute level of estimates is that eventually -- inevitably -- I'll get it wrong. It pushes, pushes, pushes sales. But any slack, and I overshoot. I did this for most of the boom, and then would make up for it during the busy months. So it was pushing the boundaries as much as possible, and then having to catch up when I miscalculate.
This is a growth strategy, not a consolidation strategy.
I guess I'm feeling more confident in my projections, and the bigger I can grow my sales the more margin I can squeeze over the long run. A consolidation strategy is fine during emergencies, but you don't want to stick to them for too long, or you'll get old and stale.
I'm going to try this tactic for a quarter or two, and if it doesn't work, then I'll go back to previous methods.
Why take the risk?
First of all, if one has sufficient money in the bank, it isn't a risk to the business, only to the cash flow. You can adjust. Only if you continue to make bad estimates or continue to ignore bad results, does this become a risk.
Secondly, I don't think you can run a vibrant business without risk. Sure you might be able to eke out a business for a number of years, but it'll show. We've all been in stores that seem like that haven't done anything risky in years...
So I'm back to the process of pitting my judgment against the world. And the more I get it right, the more reward there will be. The risk/reward ratio works both ways. While I often warn that reaching for huge returns by taking huge risks is a recipe for disaster, I could also make the case that not taking any risk would result in not making any reward.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You're not the only one consolidating:
What's next for Portland's Pearl District?
By Laura Gunderson, The Oregonian
January 09, 2010, 4:28PM
Adidas Originals opened in the summer of 2004 across from Powell's City of Books, which could be described as a shopping district's dream anchor tenant. That apparently wasn't enough to save the shoe store, which was more of a display case for Adidas' modern twists on retro designs. The little white sign went up last week near the famous blue and white logo, letting Adidas' customers know its Originals store in the Pearl District would close next week.
The news comes on the heels of Eddie Bauer's decision to shut its Pearl location, as well as the nearly overnight disappearance of the nearby Puma store.
In a recession, retail closures have become fairly common, especially among small operators: At least two restaurants left the district in the same period and didn't necessarily bring on the same eyebrow-raising. Yet in such a young shopping district, the moves -- more indicative of their parent retailers' falters or global repositioning -- seem more jarring.
Shoppers muse that in some ways, the Pearl may epitomize what went wrong with the consumer lifestyle leading up to the current financial meltdown. Bloated leases. Retail redundancies. High prices.
Shoppers rave about the district's offerings, from its broad selection of tiny independent boutiques and eateries to national destination retailers, such as Anthropologie, Lululemon and Patagonia. But it's tough, they say, to afford such a lifestyle these days, and even if they can, it's not as cool to power-shop -- unless you're clutching coupons.
More: http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2010/01/portlands_pearl_district_what.html
Post a Comment