One of the frustrations of my earlier writing efforts was people warning me away from genre mixing. I couldn't see any reason why romance and fantasy didn't go together for instance. If only I'd listened to my own instincts.
The other frustration was my efforts at SF and Fantasy were almost always knocked down because I didn't explain everything.
The current story, which is called "Eden's Return" has a lot of logistical things I'm not trying to explain, events that don't necessarily have a neat solution. (As you might guess from the title, there is a lot of symbolism going on.)
I've created a scenario where a bubble has formed over the Pacific Northwest and all the humans have been kicked out and nothing man-made can cross. It is pure nature inside, without mankind's interference.
I'm not explaining the how and the why of it.
There is a current member of my writer's group who is very concrete minded. She keeps asking, "Where are they? What are they doing? Why this? Why that?"
Metaphors need not apply.
I'm going forward. I know the story needs to have internal consistency, but that doesn't mean everything has to be nailed down. To me the story makes an intuitive sense and by the end, I'm sure I'll know more and can go back and maybe do a little explaining.
But dammit, if I want to put in a few anachronisms, I will.
Go with the flow...or don't.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
There's a series... Dies the Fire - S.M.Stirling ...the author says all tech stopped working, all gunpowder became inert (and I think all gasoline stopped being potent). No explanation. That's just the way it is. And it works.
The story takes place in the Willamette valley so it's a homey read. Not too bad in the action realm too.
Post a Comment