Thursday, August 30, 2007

Credit where it is due.

I was rereading the Wandering Eye column that mentions my blog, (The Downtown Squeeze Tightens, The Source, Sunday, July 29) and realized that HBM makes the same point about the relative smallness of the Bend downtown compared to other towns. He says 6 square blocks, which is probably more accurate (I added in Franklin, Greenwood and Brooks). Somehow I missed that.

Meanwhile, the new tourism director makes the same point I've been trying to make for some time: that it isn't the most effective use of money and promotional efforts to add to the events in the busy summer months. I'd even suggest that it is counter-productive ( to everyone except the people putting on those events.) We've got people stumbling into each other, instead of leisurely browsing the stores and spending money. We need to put our efforts into the slow months, the non-peak hours, days, and weeks. I guess it took a new guy from out of town to see the obvious. We need to quit gilding the lily. The Bend Film Festival is a prime example -- it doesn't get in the way of our summer traffic, and may even generate new traffic.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I was rereading the Wandering Eye column that mentions my blog, (The Downtown Squeeze Tightens, The Source, Sunday, July 29) and realized that HBM makes the same point about the relative smallness of the Bend downtown compared to other towns. He says 6 square blocks,
*
I read that too, while I agree that two by three blocks is old downtown, of which your are part of I see the problem created by government.

1.) The county didn't have to fill in the area north, they could have put their building in no-mans land over on division.
2.) The city didn't have to build the new city hall south, they could have moved themselves to juniper-ridge.
3.) you cannot go west because of the river
4.) you can go east, but the new I97 fwy is the limit, they should have placed the bypass farther east.

The biggest limitation of the tiny downtown is that prime north and south were grabbed by the government.

The only option for growth is east towards Stacatto.

Yes, the core downtown is Bend is small say compared to WallaWalla, but Bend was always a little desert logging town. There was no gold-rush here,

The future of Bend will be SE27th&hwy20, Division north of revere, and 3rd will become a vast 5 mile shopping paradise of strip-malls.

Perhaps the best that can be said of downtown will be art, coffee, jewelery, and condo sales, time-share sales, golf resort sales, and ... condo sales,...

In summary I wish the county and city hadn't hadn't stolen all the prime downtown real estate, they could have put their buildings anywhere east of Burns.

Duncan McGeary said...

I believe that the city actually counts the blocks on Franklin and Greenwood all the way to the overpass. Or maybe its the downtowners. Either way, it's just a definition. De facto, downtown is Wall and Bond, Minnesota and Oregon.

The city offices have ALWAYS been there, and in fact, they've moved away from that area. Same with the old school buildings and the library. Can't grow much that direction. East is blocked by Hospital Hill and Residences. West by the River, and South by more offices.

It's also a matter of traffic flow. Greenwood and Franklin are natural boundaries because they are so BUSY.

So, we can flex a half a block here and a half a block there, but mostly I think for walking purposes, downtown will always pretty much look the same.